White Elephants and Morality
I wonder what people overseas would think of Singapore if they follow the Singapore cities guide in The Economist. An extract:
Khoo d’etat
Eric Khoo, Singapore’s top film-maker, is earning plaudits at home and abroad for his latest effort, “Be With Me”. But the movie’s success did not stop a broadside on September 7th from the city-state’s Media Development Authority (MDA). The government group banned posters advertising Mr Khoo’s work, arguing that the depiction of “lesbian intimacy” violated local rules.
Although censors approved the film for audiences over 18, they found the intended advertising—which showed two teenage girls lying in an embrace—to be too much. “One of the guidelines states that posters must not depict or promote homosexual or lesbian intimacy,” the MDA said. Mr Khoo was disgusted. “There’s absolutely nothing that is sensational,” he complained to the local press. “It’s good eye-candy.”
Officers and elephants
Be careful what you say in Singapore, even if you don’t use any words. Police confirmed on September 1st that they are investigating the appearance of eight cartoon-style cut-outs of white elephants that appeared outside a completed—but as-yet-unopened—train station during a ministerial visit. The mute pachyderms appeared to be a novel way for locals to express their annoyance that Buangkok station has yet to open, despite the fact that the line was completed two years ago.
The Straits Times reported that the police received an emergency call about the apparent protest. Although the focus of their probe remains unclear, it is illegal in the tightly run city-state to put up public posters or exhibits without a permit.
That white elephant story is absolutely hilarious, and ingenious. I really want to hear the "emergency call" to the cops, "Mata! Mata! Got elephant! White! Cupboard one! Emergency! Emergency! People are being creative! And different! Mata! Mata!"
Wah lau, please lah!
About Be With Me, I had an issue with the lesbian couple featured on posters not because they were lesbian, but because they were the weakest part of the movie and Teresa should have been on the billboards instead. But Eric Khoo’s probably right…a lesbian couple is eye candy that’ll attract more attention than a dumb, deaf, blind woman.
Although I had a conversation with a friend the other day and she honestly believed that our government is an amoral, pragmatic one, and any restrictions slapped on basis of ‘morality’ (homosexuality, drugs, etc) is a request by the majority of citizens here (e.g. Religious families that don’t want their children growing up around homosexuals…*phht*!). The amoral, pragmatic government will not really care if homosexuality is screened on TV, it’s the moralistic majority of the citizens that desire it, if not there will be the "instability" (*phht!*) in society that our amoral, pragmatic government so fears, that will be an obstacle to its social/economic planning that requires an appeased and hence obedient majority.
I obviously don’t think much (*phht*s are indications) about people worrying about society on a ‘moral’ basis. But my friend does have a valid point, although I’m not sure how ‘amoral’ our government is because the individuals make up the government and there are some very religious/moral decision makers within the government. But how many percent of our population really agrees with our government, honestly?













"A young fellow like you, with a big lad on you, should be a gay porn star. ‘Twould be putting your willy to some good use, not like your father who does nothing but annoy me with his." (
